InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 33
Posts 2845
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/24/2015

Re: None

Sunday, 04/17/2022 6:13:52 PM

Sunday, April 17, 2022 6:13:52 PM

Post# of 410
AG019: Doesn't work as well as some think, and would require much larger PhIIb (and possibly PhIII) trials. Resources the company probably doesn't have.

PRGN-3005: It has taken 2-2.5+ years to enrol not even half a dozen patients, with efficacy being very minimal (I'm being generous!). No patients have been enrolled in the IV arm (that I'm aware of).

PRGN-3006: While encouraging (in those that got the therapy with LD chemo), only a small number have been treated, and now the PI says it could be a bridge to a transplant.

PRGN-3007: The first patient hasn't been dosed. Also, it will face competition from the likes next-gen versions, such as LYEL's.

INXN-4001: Looks dead.

PRGN-2009: Mono is likely dead as not a single patient responded. As for the combo, too early to say, but the former should say it all.

PRGN-2012: Looks to me like they are trying to cherry-pick the best responses, as they didn't disclose the data from the others treated to date.

Finally, mbIL-15 isn't working as expected, and going forward, it seems they won't be giving the CAR-T's without LD chemo as they once hoped. Also, there is talk about redosing!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent PGEN News