InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3057
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: None

Saturday, 04/16/2022 2:11:40 AM

Saturday, April 16, 2022 2:11:40 AM

Post# of 797570
***THE PLAINTIFF JOSHUA ANGEL GOT BURNED***
In a brief filed on April 14th, he was compelled to attach a letter he received from the DOJ that you can feel that it's fired up with the misbehavor of this rogue plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a proposal of Settlement Agreement days earlier and it was rejected. Then, he wanted to file a voluntary dismissal of his case, but indicating that the court shall retain the Settlement Agreement "for future Court direction" (after being rejected). The response from the DOJ in the last letter was harsh:

To again be clear: there is no settlement in this case.... Your continued representations otherwise are false and utterly without factual support, and we urge you to cease making such representations.


Also, the DOJ claims that he was wrong in his reason to voluntarily dismiss his case, because the Fairholme case isn't non-appelable yet as Joshua claims "after 45 days". The DOJ said that he is wrong because it's 90 days and until May 23, 2022. So, Joshua Angel wanted to voluntarily dismiss his case using a false excuse. The odds are that it's because he was advised to withdraw his lawsuit, feeling the heat from the shareholders that are denouncing that the corrupt plaintiffs are abusing of the Court process in collusion with the DOJ attys: the so called Govt theft story.

Their misconduct doesn't disappear as if by magic. There is a crime of conspiracy to defraud the United States.