RemSleep Holdings Inc (RMSL)

[ZetaReticuli]

The hired toxicologist set and/or reviewed the new protocol that failed:

Although the changes to the protocol led me to believe this test would produce a better result, the repeated test was also a failure.

He's also the one who chose the new lab before the first retested in case the new protocols didn't get the result they wanted.

In anticipation of this potential result, another completely separate and capable laboratory was located by Superior Toxicology on REMSleep’s behalf.

Why would you need a backup lab if you were the one who revised the protocols that you claimed were erroneous in the first test that failed?

There are a lot of questions that need to be answered if they want to pass the scrutiny of the FDA who might perceive these actions as shopping for a specific result rather than looking out for the interest of public safety.