Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[M I A]

Agreement ugolett-my-fnf-go lied.

But isn't it interesting how gb acknowledges that, because if that comes out and produces a favorable ruling due to ugoletti lying then how does that not produce a positive outcome for common holders? How proof and ruling in shareholder favor that ugoletti lied while still talking about sp conversion?

Wouldn't ugoletti lying followed up with positive ruling remove any talk of sp conversion from gb or any other?

Or am I missing something?

Thanks.