InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,633.91
(
1.02%
)
US TECH 100
20,107.60
(
0.99%
)
Dow Jones
39,721.36
(
1.09%
)
Brent Oil
85.39
(
0.40%
)
Bitcoin
57,486.32
(
-0.47%
)
Post# of 82841
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

smartmoney77

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 41
Posts 3868
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/11/2006

smartmoney77

Re: Jim Bishop post# 55128

Tuesday, 02/06/2007 1:28:15 PM

Tuesday, February 06, 2007 1:28:15 PM

Post# of 82841
Well if they prove the revenues I think it would be as easy to prove the govt. contract even if it is through a third party. I don't see an in between. Cyberkey is a fraud or not. If audited statements prove millions of dollars in revenue then they are cleared. I don't see how the revenues could be there without the contract. And if the numbers are proven then they are proven. The SEC wants to protect us from a fraud and a scam not get wrapped up in a game of semantics.

My posts are my opinion, make your own decisions. And remember, all fear is an illusion.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up