InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 8119
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/22/2007

Re: futrcash post# 5258

Tuesday, 03/15/2022 11:11:23 AM

Tuesday, March 15, 2022 11:11:23 AM

Post# of 5439
There are leases all over Texas & Oklahoma that would produce much more than daybreaks CA lease. Seems like a lot of work and capital investment for only 30 BOE after 10+ years right? Reabold has something Jim wants or is after. Likely higher flowing leases much better than what he has for 10+ years. Let’s face it, 30 BOE after that many years, money invested and time, isn’t exactly breaking any production records.,

There must be something else, has to be imo. So going to allegedly 100 BOE a day is I guess a big deal for this operation. Still it’s CA, wells fresh drilled will spud lots of initial BOE- then they slow down dramatically. Slow and steady eddy.

But- it has its drawbacks - sure dependable. BUT- not a lot of oil overall BOE. To grow one needs higher BOE daily, to attract institutional investors and support. DBRM doesn’t have that and still may not after this merge. Which means PPS, shareholders it could be a flop, or a mixed bag. You can’t have 100 BOE daily and trading where it’s at- imo I just want higher PPS. Issue all PR’s they want too, but deliver a higher PPS to make it worthwhile common shareholders.

There is potential here, always was. But- we need imo to see institutional support here imo it’s just as important as 100 BOE.

Maybe Reabold sits on 100 BOE+ 1-4 well gushers? If Reabold can be a cash cow, then use that $, to go after other strategic geo leases and roll them up. Increase production and do something here. I’m bored with the kern leases after this many years here.

Let’s move on here and start getting institutional support and boost PPS.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DBRM News