InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 293
Posts 4644
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/12/2008

Re: 5bagger post# 713800

Tuesday, 03/08/2022 10:09:48 AM

Tuesday, March 08, 2022 10:09:48 AM

Post# of 793240
Oberdictum - yes remanded per SCOTUS but retrospective relief seemed to be a topic that the appeals court was uncomfortable with.

Yes, a minority of the court of appeals judges dissented. Five Judges (Haynes, Stewart, Dennis, Graves and Costa) of 17 dissented.

You state it-is-what-it-is, a very short remand as directed by SCOTUS.

Yes, the undecided portion of the case concerning compensable harm was remanded to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

So, the real "opinion" is if the District court will agree with Trump's claim that he wanted to but had no time to un-do c-ship / NWS.

The dissenters in Collins all said that Trump could have directed Treasury to do the work but did not.


Not certain what arguments the Plaintiff's attorneys will offer in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas.