Here we go again
First thing I would tell any newcomers here about my investment in GOFF and George Sharp of over nine months now is this: I have witnessed GOFF being written off for dead almost every single day for all of those nine months by an array of naysayers.
A few are still doing it.
So, a major word of caution to those reading any fear uncertainty and dread posts about GOFF again today, even as the stock is on the cusp of a name change, ticker change, a 3:1 forward split(!), and a merger announcement: The same thing is happening again.
Even though the critics and naysayers have been 100 percent incorrect about GOFF and Sharp for nine months, somehow THIS time they are suddenly going to get it right. About there either being no merger happening at all for GOFF, or a merger that will be hugely disappointing (including some murky negative speculation about the merger possibly involving some sort of non-NFTs related "BLOCKS" deal, or Forwardly shenanigans. Where does THAT come from??)
The "hype" about a likely merger of "Worldwide NFT Inc." with the "Worldwide Asset Exchange"(which naysayers choose to describe as "hype", because it is code for b.s). actually came from the word choice of George Sharp directly, and from simple Logic 101, also known as common sense.
The logic goes like this: George Sharp is a reputable and straight shooting OTC custodian who would not engage in duplicitous practices, including a deliberately misleading name change of his stock. There is only ONE viable merger candidate that 1) has "Worldwide" in its name, that 2) is a private NFT-focused company ("THE NFT" co.) that is actually worthy of a 3:1 split, that 3) is in apparent need of funding, that 4) would be wise to become securities trading compliant asap to avoid SEC violations for selling "unregistered securities" and that 5) has a blockchain signature token to sell (WAXP) and a clear need for building more brand name recognition quickly in what is a rapidly ever more crowded field of token selling cryotp companies.
Anyone who speculates that WAX is more likely to do an IPO or direct listing rather than a reverse merger is showing their lack of research. Firstly by being unaware of the comments that ceo William Quigley has constantly made in interviews and in his bitcoin expo stage talks about the crypto-averse "feudal lords" who run centralized banking.
And by their dismissing the fact that Malcom CasSelle, the late cofounder of WAX, was a veteran chief executive of nine businesses including one private company that he reverse merged into a public shell, making the business "suddenly worth billions of dollars."
Also being dismissed by those who deny that Worldwide NFT could be merging with the Worldwide Asset Exchange is Quigley's and WAX's direct connection to Mike Novogratz, CEO of Galaxy Digital, who took his private NY based co. public via a Canadian shell.
This was CasSelle speaking in 2017 on the subject of the founding seed investment in WAX by Novogratz:
“Having a legendary investor like Mike Novogratz along with all of our all-star team of investors, advisors, and video game industry legends see the potential in our vision for the WAX platform is an incredible testament to what we have planned,” says Malcolm CasSelle, President of WAX and CIO of OPSkins.
That was when Novogratz and his newly created $500 million crypto fund, Galaxy Investment Partners, had invested in Worldwide Asset eXchange (WAX), "a new decentralized marketplace for trading video game assets to get it started."
Novogratz went public via the TSX. No doubt he would've preferred to go the U.S. OTC route, but, alas, there apparently was no such thing as a fully vetted, audited, reporting and SEC approved shell to be found that had the necessary cleaned up share structure that could survive the regulatory and crypto-skeptical scrutiny in this country.
Do you have any idea just how difficult, time consuming, and EXPENSIVE setting up just such an acceptable shell would be?
Yes, George Sharp certainly does, and those appreciative GOFF shareholders who have been sticking with the stock for the duration do, too.
Since the company's founding, WAX has morphed into becoming primarily focused on NFTs since last year ("The KING of NFTs.) That parallrls what I, and others invested in GOFF since last summer can recall as the custodianship shifting from opportunities "in blockchain" to the the updated status this year when George got more specific with GOFF in January, narrowing it down to "THE NFT co.," and then, narrowing it down even further to "Worldwide NFT" Inc.
Logic: if I/we have heard of the Worldwide Asset Exchange then George Sharp MUST have heard of it, too.
If you believe that George would deliberately rename GOFF using the one key word, "Worldwide," that would absolutely make it seem like it could be WAX, when it really isn't, then you believe he is deliberately misleading people and "hyping" the stock and thst he is a duplicitous con man.
I know that he is not.
So where does not "hype" but logic then take us?
Bottom line is doubters are going to doubt. They believe the worst about George. Including that GOFF =WAX is "too big" of a merger for him to pull off.
(There's some really "in-depth" analysis right there. Do you even know how "big" WAX is by way of private valuation? There is some information that the WAXP token is worth somewhere around $600M but the co. behind got seed funding of a reported $40 million or so from Novogratz and others five years ago and that is all that's been reported since.)
The key thing is, however, that doubters and non-believers in George Sharp and GOFF have been wrong from the beginning. I'm telling you they will be wrong again here.
AI
