Allied Energy Corp (AGYP)

[BCNstocks]

You found two affidavit liens against MNA (former operator) that involve work done and equipment provided at the Prometheus. It does NOT relate to Allied. Has this lien been granted or awarded? What matters is WHO the liens are against. And it's not Allied. And it's not the property owner of the Prometheus. It's against the former operators THAT DO NOT OWN THE PROMETHEUS.

To sum it up the lien is an affidavit. It has not been awarded. There is no judgment against the Prometheus well.

Legally and clearly demonstrate how this impacts Allied in any way shape or form. Who is the lien against? (Not Allied). Just say it. It's right there in the affidavit. Show any liens or judgments against ALLIED. There are none.


This is verbiage taken from the LIEN AFFIDAVIT that HAS NOT BEEN AWARDED OR GRANTED



Previous post from February 28th (Zap):

Over this weekend we've been told there was a lien against prometheus and 2 judgments. Well, that's bullshit.

We've already shown how the main document is an AFFIDAVIT lien which does not grant or award anything until the courts and/or land-owner grant a judgment.

So I went and purchased the first judgment file that was prattled on about and I uploaded that. You can view that here (and I will attach to the end of this post also): https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2022/2/26/mruovpepeoil-is-a-fucktard.jpg

This document was supposed to somehow impact Allied and/or the Prometheus lease and current production. As you can see it doesn't. In fact, this judgment was supposed to be tied to the Haliburton lien affidavit and it isn't remotely related to that document as it is BORETS that is awarded a judgment against MNA. MNA is the former Prometheus operator. They are on Allied's current P-4 as the FORMER OPERATOR. They SIGNED the P-4 officially showing they are NO LONGER ON THE PROMETHEUS OR PART OF THE PROMETHEUS IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.

So, there's that one.

As soon as I posted that document that didn't help a particular cause I was forcefully admonished both publicly and privately to go after another document that would cost me $149 to view in entirety.

Here it is the purchase page and description of the document. Remember this is supposed to be a JUDGMENT:

We've already shown how the main document is an AFFIDAVIT lien which does not grant or award anything until the courts and/or land-owner grant a judgment.

So I went and purchased the first judgment file that was prattled on about and I uploaded that. You can view that here (and I will attach to the end of this post also): https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2022/2/26/mruovpepeoil-is-a-fucktard.jpg

This document was supposed to somehow impact Allied and/or the Prometheus lease and current production. As you can see it doesn't. In fact, this judgment was supposed to be tied to the Haliburton lien affidavit and it isn't remotely related to that document as it is BORETS that is awarded a judgment against MNA. MNA is the former Prometheus operator. They are on Allied's current P-4 as the FORMER OPERATOR. They SIGNED the P-4 officially showing they are NO LONGER ON THE PROMETHEUS OR PART OF THE PROMETHEUS IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.

So, there's that one.

As soon as I posted that document that didn't help a particular cause I was forcefully admonished both publicly and privately to go after another document that would cost me $149 to view in entirety.

Here it is the purchase page and description of the document. Remember this is supposed to be a JUDGMENT:





And here's a direct link to it: https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2022/2/28/hobdm=pepeoil-is-a-lying-sack-of-dogshit.jpg

I don't need to spend $149 to determine the nature of this document. It's dated BEFORE the Haliburton lien affidavit. And it still does not seem related to the Haliburton lien affidavit. IT IS BORETS AGAINST MNA, like the other document that IS a judgment. This document explicitly states it is a "statement and affidavit in support." This is the nature of it, so not a judgment. Very likely it is a description of services and receipts that demonstrate BORETS' claims against MNA. MNA being the former operator and having nothing to do with Allied and nothing currently to do with Prometheus.

Facts are so very important. We are able to access and identify truth as we compile the facts and interpret them with basic common sense.

There are no liens or lien affidavits against Allied. There are no judgments against Allied. There have been attempts to show encumbrances against the Prometheus lease and we've demonstrated with official documentation how that is simply not the case.

Thankfully, Allied has been officially producing and officially selling oil from the Prometheus lease. And it's all verified by the Texas Railroad website.



Seriously, man. Look at all of this DD. Obviously we are the ones doing the work on compiling DD while you only post vague links and comments.