I'm not quite sure what I should find 'exciting' in that posters comments and appraisal. It is more or less, in essence, what I have been saying, and what any reasoned assessment would conclude. It's a very wild gamble - and I feel it is less than 50-50.
The behaviour, to me, would be in keeping with a company unloading lots of 'shares' gambling, that by setting such a low price, they can bring in enough on volume to milk the cow dry (and some) before the promisory notes herald - sic transit gloria. And another one bites the dust.
I hope I am wrong as I do not like to lose money myself, and therefore would not wish it on others and derive any satisfaction from such an end.
Bon Chance to all