InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 54
Posts 11856
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/07/2017

Re: uksausage post# 44984

Friday, 02/18/2022 5:02:36 PM

Friday, February 18, 2022 5:02:36 PM

Post# of 60596
Why what are you figuring and what are you using for your numbers? I'm certain I already stated my numbers were conservative based on the lowest numbers per quarter over the last four. Except for recurring revenue from generation that will not be the lowest number. I matched the highest number based on increasing Revenue. There can be many variables which is why nobody can pick an accurate number although if you have 10 people picking numbers and they all know what they're doing somebody might hit it right with a little luck. Wish I had an idea how the analyst that picked 48 million and the analyst that picked 26 million came up with their numbers that's a massive difference. And I did not know what their numbers were when I picked mine I believe I came up with 38 million a few weeks ago. But seeing what happens in q1 should give us a better idea of what to expect in Q2. If q1 misses it will still be the highest quarter they've had in over a year regardless and Q2 should be even better. I don't see any way possible they don't beat the lowest analyst estimates unless they did not collect something from South Korea. Both payments were due long before January 31st and fuel cell didn't have to do anything to receive those payments other than accept the order from Posco. Anyone expecting less than 36 million clearly does not expect them to collect 11.5 and 10.5 from South Korea. There is absolutely zero chance other Revenue does not exceed $14 million, hence why I picked 38 and said that was conservative. Which is significantly over analyst consensus.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FCEL News