If any of you who are not familiar with Howard Griswold, then here's a sample:
Title of Nobility (U.C.C. related)
Prelude... Section 1461 of the IRS code -- with-holding agents made liable.
Tax is imposed on aliens and foreign corporations, who had sources of income
within the U.S. (which is D.C.). Green federal reserve notes come from D.C.
so that makes me a foreign corporation or alien dealing with D.C.; doing
business within and having a source of income from within.
(The Following is a transcription of part of a speech by Mr. Howard Griswold,
in 1994 and transcribed by John Roger Ball)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Grant of a title of nobility, with all of the combined benefits and privileges attached, to the
empty title of citizenship, originally laid upon the slaves of the civil war times, under the tern "negro"
was created by congress in the fourteenth amendment. These benefits and privileges were later
challenged in the 1883 civil rights cases with no mention of the title of nobility, but a question as to
the benefits and privileges having been laid upon one group of people to the exclusion of the rest.
The decision of the Court at that time, that the privileges are not to be limited to one group only,
prompted Congress to extend the benefits and privileges to all of society, through it's wholly and
partly owned corporations. Government cannot deal with me diractly. The Constitution gave the
government no authority to deal with me directly; but it didn't say that they couldn't set up a
corporation, and have the corporation deal with you, representing itself to be an agency of the
government. So that's what they did, that's what the fed is, circulating this commercial paper for
them, and such.
Anyway, the above mentioned corporations are monopolies, which control all of the essential
functions of modern life, and today they do, and business under the laws of congress. Acceptance
by the people of the afformentioned privileges, and benefits, from congress monopoly
corporations, for their necessary functions of life and business, constitute a liability to congress,
and make the individual subject to the jurisdiction of the united states, as privileged citizens of the
united states, under the federal civil rights jurisdiction under the fourteenth amendment. This
jurisdiction, and all the laws under it are based on the unlawful title of nobility, and are thus not
real laws at all, but are treated as though they are law. This type of law is called colorable law.
Now, a little synopsis of who is, and who isn't. The people who are a resident of the seat of
government (District of Columbia) or any federal possession, enclave, or fort, are without question
within the constitutionally limited jurisdiction of the United States and congress in an at-law
construction. So if you live there, then you come under their laws, and you are liable for a tax.
The people who are non-resident aliens of the District of Columbia, or any federal possession,
enclave, or fort, etc., are not in any way subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Congress,
unless they are effectively connected with a trade or business within the District of Columbia, or
any federal possession, enclave, fort, etc., in an at-law construction. So a non-resident alien,
unless he makes a move to be connected with the District, is exempt. The people who are non-
resident aliens of Washington D.C., it's ossessions, enclaves, forts, etc., (202) and accept any of
the benefits or privileges, by doing business with any of the above mentioned government
corporations, are effectively connected with a trade or business within the District of Columbia
and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and congress, in a colorable law jurisdiction.
So you see I put at law real law for the first two, which don't apply to anybody, today. The
only way it applies, is the trap your in. You're all in this trap, of being a non-resident of the District;
but yet effectively connected for the taxable for a trade or business within the District, , by dealing
with their green commercial paper units. Even though we're outside, they came from there, so the
source was within the United States, the District of Columbia; so your trapped. Not to in any way
limit the list of examples; but one most important example would be: To accept and use the green
commercial paper documents of title from the federal reserve bank, Inc., which circulate as money,
from the U.S. Treasury in the District of Columbia. These banknotes, which circulate as money,
nut are not real, are thus colorable, and the law which controls the use of said notes, is also
colorable. This colorable law is applied to any people who make themselves liable and subject
to the jurisdiction of the United States, by accepting and using the commercial paper notes of the
federal reserve Inc., and also apply to anything that the people aquire through the trading of said
monopoly bank notes. That includes the property you buy with it. It all comes back to the District
of Columbia as property.
This colorable law is called the Federal common law, as expressed in the Erie Railroad v.
Thompkin case of 1938. A brief by a lawyer named Albert J. Schweppe - What has happened
to Federal Jurisprudence? This will tell you about the Erie decision and the results it caused. What
he tells you in here is, that the existing general common law came to an abrupt end at the Erie
decision. And in that case, because the Supreme Court of the United States said, that because
there is no substantive money in circulation, there is no general common law, and that from now
on, because everything that is done in this country is done with negotiable instruments, the
negotiable instrument laws will rule the court's decisions. In other words, the courts at that time
all became colorable, because negotiable instruments are colorable representations of real money,
so the courts became colorable. If they're using the colorable law to rule their decisions, then
they're colorable.
So you see, we have no law at all, and we have no real courts. And if you read the definition of
Anarchy in the dictionary, we live in it. The application of common law is predicated on the
necessity of dealing with substance. The negotiable instrument laws, that they put into force
replaced the money law, and when they did that, they replaced all common law. Now they gave
you a way back to the common law, because they can't do these things. They had to give us a
way back: UCC 1-103 gives us a way back to the real law; because they can't do that, but they
did it. As long as they can get away with it, by most people not having knowledge of it, they'll do
stuff. And until you see the use they apply to it, in order to get out of the old law, and the
reasoning behind it. This colorable law is called the federal common law, as expressed in the
Erie v. Thompkins case of 1938; and has been codified as the Uniform Commercial Code; which
has been accepted by all the states, and is the ruling decision law of all state and federal courts.
There are four court cases that say that the states must use the federal rules of decision, which
is the Uniform Commercial Code, in the decision of their cases; which means they're operating
under federal law. They are representing the federal money, even in the state courts. No law
exists in any court today; it is all color-of-law. We cannot accept these benefits openly; we can
only accept them ambiguously.
The governments corporations have withheld the foregoing knowledge and pertinent information
from the people who blindly do business of necessity with the corporate monopoly, in order to
trick them into the acceptance, which is fraud in the factum, or in the essence, under section
3-305(2)(c) of the UCC. This fraud in the essence, which leads to an agreement to do business
with one or more of the government corporate monopolies, is what led the people into the liabilty
and made them subject to the jurisdiction of the united states, and the incapacity of the title of
nobility - called citizen of the united states. An incapacity is something that lowers your capacity.
You can only do what I let you do within the realm of that debt. You've got to do what the King
says. This is called 'feudal' law, 'feudal' property law. You bought your land with my commercial
paper, which I put out there for you to use as money, and I gave you a deed to use land that I
already owned. Then it's a lifetime deed. At the end of your life, it reverts back to me. It was
called feudal property law in England, and that's the way it works. And basically, that's the way
it works today!
AI
