InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 462
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2006

Re: rbl100 post# 3793

Monday, 02/05/2007 12:10:49 PM

Monday, February 05, 2007 12:10:49 PM

Post# of 221867
Thanks fellows, this is fine if those figures are correct. However, I feel that the company has had plenty of time since last November 3 (the date of the company posting) to have got some confirmation of the company's value.

I have also found that there are very shrewed people out there who look for undervalued companies (and over valued ones) and, therefore, they don't stay that way for long

Percentage wise, that would be quite a lot of 'undervaluation'.

Consequently, I am most sceptical.

I read from some past company info that they had/ or were, moving out of PM's and into something of greater benefit.

This is what I was hoping would be disclosed.

Unless this company has something offering positive potential
to be disclosed, then it is totally irresponsible to have been
offering a F/s at this time. The only rational for it so doing
if nothing is forthcoming, is as I described in my earlier post -#3767 and #3769.

Thanks again for your response with data.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.