Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

SFRX counted those years, so I did……

too. Besides, they got ALL the data HTQ had and continue to use it.

23 year’s? Now who is stretching things? Oh yeah I guess if you are counting the years before sfrx was around. Your looking back to the former company? Misleading in my opinion. Jmo

Here’s what the company’s PR included.

HTQ has surveyed, explored, and researched the site and historical archives for over a decade.

Scott Herber, Biologist for HTQ, added "We have gathered years of information from exploring and researching the archives and are ready to complete the final chapter of this ship's final voyage."

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/seafarer-gains-third-treasure-site-191005961.html

The much touted ring area (it’s not been proven to be a site) was previously known to hold debris. It’s in the report. See below. If you take offense to the FACT that the project is now beginning the 23rd year, perhaps you should take it up with the company. I’m not “stretching” anything. I would suggest you that you are if you don’t count the HTQ years.

Regardless, read the 2 sections closely below from their own reports. I thought they had a new gold finding toy that could see all, blah, blah, blah. What’s up with looking at sediment and determining the age of the debris?

I could care less if gold went down on a wreck from the 1700’s or the 1800’s and what type of sediment it was was lying in. I thought it was all things treasure now, but they just seem to be playing “archeologist.” See particularly the last paragraph below. Then tell me who’s misleading.

Also, did Mel Fisher spend years looking at sediment and get wood tested like Seafarer’s has IN THE SAME SMALL AREA? The approach they’re taking isn’t producing results, is it?

I thought the Timmy Toy was going to tell them where to look, not data HTQ provided YEARS ago.

I stand by my comments regarding commencing the 23rd year.