Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[kthomp19]

everything that the SCOTUS says must be considered law

Good to see you acknowledge that. Now get it through your skull that this includes the fact that 4617(f) is fully legal and 4617(b)(2)(J)(ii) is constitutional.

Now to make sense of it

When you finally do so, let me know. Nothing in your post after this made any sense at all.

if the president controls the director of the FHFA absent 4512(b)(2), it cannot forbid Judicial review on his actions in 4617(f) but if it cannot forbid judicial review the APA could not have failed in SCOTUS, as the SCOTUS said relief is prohibited by HERA 4617(f)

Once again you have either failed to read or failed to understand the Collins ruling.

The Supreme Court says 4617(f) only forbids judicial review of valid acts of a conservator or receiver:

The anti-injunction clause applies only where the FHFA exercised its “powers or functions” “as a conservator or a receiver.” Where the FHFA does not exercise but instead exceeds those powers or functions, the anti-injunction clause imposes no restrictions.