InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 569
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/05/2008

Re: surfkast post# 13530

Tuesday, 02/08/2022 2:01:01 PM

Tuesday, February 08, 2022 2:01:01 PM

Post# of 14951
Surfkast,

According to your post - it seems that my theory or concerns could be accurate and could allow them to acquire considerable stock at pricing way below the already stunningly low market prices of 7 to 9 cents.

That would make the concept of "being in it for the long haul" very appealing to non public shareholders or insider partners . . . but potentially could be quite painful to public shareholders in terms of dilution or motivation to have been succeeding during this entire period from Spring 2021 thru current.

I'm not claiming it has been done deliberately or intentionally - but certainly the charts I've often posted and refered to . . . or the lack of followup on many promises . . . or the lack of correcting and updating many public investment sites I highlighted over the last year . . it hasn't hurt any of those who hold such options/warrants that are not based on rising stock prices and repeated early successes for the company.

It appears we as public shareholders were carrying a lot more risk than we realized all along. By the way - it also explains why they did so well getting the financials corrected and establishing SEC acceptance - yet seemed totally confused once the acquisitions were fully completed.

JMHO