Yes, no change to my thoughts.
I (we) must look at what IS, and BLPG reporting only shows positive growth (look at reporting) period.
We can see that the update of the articles, shows clear direction as BLPG grows into this next stage.
Website has been updated, just not completed, which tells me that they (BLPG) actions are still not ready to be laid out for the public.....yet.
Also keep in mind the company is expanding rather quickly, with years long leases for expansion in Arizona, and Ohio as well now (see SEC reporting), as well as an increase in equipment and furniture/other.
Based on SEC reporting the only issue I can see is that they are having a had time expanding as fast as they could/want to.
If you still have doubts about BLPG hire a watcher to see what's going on at their main location (or go yourself and speak to Decker (ops manager)) about their operations, or call someone using BLPG for their services, ask them what they think of company etc...etc...
They still have a lot of Related debt, but that all only belongs to Hypur and Hypur ventures I and II and CGDK, all of these entities have one thing in common (Chris Galvin), BUT...BUT keep in mind other than CGDK the other two entities have multiple partners (chairmen/investors etc.) multiple individuals within each of these entities are absolutely vested in outcome, its the leadership (controller) challenges that must be grown into. NONE which will make BLPG a bad company.
So without writing another two page document, YES, I do not see any negatives currently, NONE.
Now that stated, I fully concur with Harold (Help Me) when it comes to most Reverse Splits (RS), but in this case and when aligned with BLPG new articles, all it did was correct a known imbalance. Lets for the sake of argument say that BLPG (or whatever they call themselves in the future) had 2-3 other companies align within it - how would that effect overall operations...read the articles again...very interesting.
Go BLPG, GO Hypur, and GO OTHER....
Anyway my thoughts.
KD
