InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 217
Posts 28308
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/24/2002

Re: None

Thursday, 01/27/2022 3:14:53 PM

Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:14:53 PM

Post# of 111060
Just in case you don't understand what took place in court that Cotton is posting about. Lehman filed a letter with the court in response to Wu's motions. Wu responded with a letter. Court came back and said to Lehman that no further response is required by Lehman at this time, and motions from WU have been terminated.

LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Garrett Fail dated January 19, 2022 re: Letter Response to District Court Regarding Rex Wu Filings (Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 12) and the letter (ECF No. 13)). Document filed by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc...(Fail, Garrett)
Att: 1 Exhibit 1- Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration,
Att: 2 Exhibit 2- Certificate of Service



LETTER addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from R. Wu, dated 1/20/22 re: I am writing to bring to the attention of the Honorable Court that misleading statements and omissions continue and are an issue with LBHI and the Plan Administrator when it comes to presenting information about LBHI's Capital Trusts K, L, M and N during the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Bankruptcy proceedings etc. I request the Court to disallow the letter that was filed by the Plan Administrator as it is a substitute for a late motion.. Document filed by Rex Wu.(sc

)

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re:14 Letter, filed by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Motions terminated:12 MOTION for Reconsideration re;10 Memorandum & Opinion,. filed by Rex Wu. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. No further response is required by Appellee at this time. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to Mr. Wu. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/25/2022) (jca)


Joe Stocks