Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[ano]

You have your cases mixed up. The Fairholme case is only about the NWS.

13-465-413 amended complaint Fairholme Funds, Inc. et al v. USA

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs seek a judgment as follows:
A. Awarding Plaintiffs just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the Government's taking of their property;
B. Awarding Fannie and Freddie just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the Government's taking of their property;
C. Awarding Plaintiffs damages for the Government's illegal exaction of their stock; D. Awarding Fannie and Freddie damages for the Government's illegal exaction of their net worth;
E. Awarding Plaintiffs damages for the Government's breach of fiduciary duty;
F. Awarding Fannie and Freddie damages for the Government's breach of fiduciary duty;
G. Awarding Plaintiffs damages for the Government's breach of implied-in-fact contract;
H. Awarding Fannie and Freddie damages for the Government's breach of implied-in-fact contract; (constitutional claim SCOTUS)
I. Awarding Plaintiffs pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;

What to do with it? The Supreme Court already decided this too. "For cause" became "at will", and everything else in HERA stayed exactly the same.

please point me to where SCOTUS Says it is now "at-will " and not stricken