Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[madprophet]

Here is a post from January 2018. All the cafc Judge talk happened at end of 2017 up until March 2018 if want to go back and look up all the info.


Well now actually Dyk, Mayer, Prost are the 3 to really avoid, Wallach is bad if paired with those.
Newman, Chen, Stoll and O'Malley are really good ones to have. Wallach tends to be good if paired with those.
So a bad Judge draw can drop us, but about an equal chance of a really good Judge draw, the rest are in the middle. Do some reading, see for yourselves what the Judges do, here are some places below to go look, and plenty more..going to be lots of reading for those who actually want to know and not just go with some form of Blanket statements.
This has been talked about and the math has been worked out it is a fairly small chance we get a horrible judge draw, a small chance we get best case scenario draw,,and a mostly it is going to fall somewhere in the middle
So doom and gloom is about as equal as start the party we are sitting pretty.
Above all else, it really depends on how much hype, how much buying, and what kind of run up we get leading up to the actual Judge draw...
but do some research, do some math, find out for your self what the odds are, and make decisions accordingly.

https://www.law360.com/articles/999115/fed-circ-s-2017-patent-decisions-a-statistical-analysis

http://www.bilskiblog.com/blog/2017/06/alicestorm-april-update-and-the-impact-of-tc-heartland.html

http://www.skgf.com/uploads/1561/doc/The_Federal_Circuit_Judges_You_Want_On_Your_PTAB_Appeal.pdf


http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2013/05/12/5-cafc-judges-say-computers-patentable-not-software/id=40251/

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/05/11/federal-circuits-great-dissenter/id=83094/

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/03/15/jimmie-reyna-supreme-court/id=67129/