Wednesday, January 19, 2022 2:23:27 AM
We really need the study unblinded (for better or worse) and reviewed. Whatever we have at 700 is statistically most likely what we will have at 1000. I'm not sure if the data isn't convincing enough and they're hoping it gets better or they feel they don't have enough statistical information.
The (what I'll call) add-ons that were recently being looked at, could be done with the trial unblinded.
Don't forget that while we feel we have THE solution, the organizations you mentioned are inundated and want to know results - not possibilities.
I'm still extremely hopeful, but I think the clock is getting close to midnight.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM