#1, I don't need to prove anything, although in effect, I have proven what I said, not because I remember what ppl said and/or didn't say about these things, but because I put forth the challenge for anyone to refute my refutations of the original list of allegations by simply presenting the evidence which is right here in the board record. Doesn't get any more fair or liberal than that. After all, the original allegations must have come from the board to begin with & so ALL the evidence is there to find & use to support the allegations. That's a very easy thing to do for many ppl. So, as I said, afaic, I've already proven my refutations since I'm certain that no one will be able to show different. That leaves me correct by default since no one can or will provide any proof to backup the orig BS allegations. And make no mistake, they ARE BS! I've heard them all before & many are no more than copycat regurgitations. Some don't even make sense in terms of ea time the allegation is repeated, the more corrupted it becomes, until it becomes nonsense, red herrings, hyperbole. In fact, there are examples of that in your post...
Example:
"vplm didn't win all those IPRs"
No one ever tried to say that. The original allegation was that supposedly many ppl said that vplm would not win any of the IPRs. I don't recall anyone saying that. It's possible somebody might have, but I don't think it was something much if at all. If I'm correct about that, then that deems it a bogus allegation to begin with. Remember, these allegations were presented as things that were commonly & often said by some. If any allegations represent someone with a passing opinion, rarely, if ever heard, then it ot warranted to include it in a list of allegations that are supposed to be serious mistakes or lies. And of course, added to that is the fact I've explained many times that the IPR decisions weren't true "wins" anyway because they gained zero in the decisions (with the possible exception of estoppel, which I've never seen that used or brought up in any proceedings). So far those IPR decisions have not to my knowledge, cut any cheese anywhere at any time other than the mere "bragging rights", and I said this would be the case before the decisions even came out. And then, last but not least, the fact that the ptab was proven to be a corrupt organization. Of course there was a clean sweep after powerful & eloquent Sawyer threatened them with federal RICO charges, lol.
Next:
"they didn't get the patents approved".
Another example of something one ever said to my memory. Heck, one of the patente was already approved before the acquisition which in itself debunks such a silly allegation. And the rest of the patent applications were very close to approval already, so this allegation makes zero sense. It's just bullshit fabrication. I guess you have to make up bogus allegations when there is nothing solid to use against the negative vplm sentiment. An understandable human foible.
Next:
"those infamous shares aren't coming back"
If I were you, I wouldn't even bring that up since I see that over time, you have said both that the shares WILL come back & WON'T ever come back so I'd step away from that one. Regardless, it's such a simple thing to address since no shares have ever come back, period. And vplm 1st said they would, the better part of 10 yrs ago. It's not even worth an argument. No shares have ever come back...
Well, there you have it. All debunked handily and truly.
I'm done speaking on it unless contrary evidence is shown.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
AI
