Followers | 8 |
Posts | 392 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 12/16/2020 |
![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, January 08, 2022 6:02:37 PM
Yes. But. The question of whether doing so would support a shareholder legal claim is IMO an unsettled one. The USG wants to name its haircut JPS price but prefers more leverage in the form of further rulings barring the front door (to name the “4–dog defense”: standing, failure to state a claim, HERA succession, and HERA anti-injunction). So they can just wait. IMO until a Fairholme-esqu case a survives a *final pre-trial dismissal motion*, the odds for Ps remain stacked. But I am rooting for Ps.
Now momentarily set aside HERA. There is also a ‘5th dog’: and he bites. Courts have a settled doctrine in federal takings of contract rights cases that is nearly impossiblr (the ‘4th branch’ makes its political living in large part by being empowered by Congress to interfere with third party contracts and rearrange private deals—all in ‘public interest’. Very common. If you want some related links lemme know.
FEATURED POET and Luxshare Tech Expand Product Offerings for Artificial Intelligence Networks • Aug 1, 2024 9:28 AM
Management Discusses Financial Filings of Global Arena Holding Inc., for 10-K 2023 and 10-Q, 1st Quarter 2024 • GAHC • Aug 1, 2024 9:14 AM
VAYK Announces LOI to Acquire $1 Million Home Service Company to Support Airbnb Business • VAYK • Aug 1, 2024 9:00 AM
Duane Forrester Joins INDEXR as SVP of Search • MONI • Jul 31, 2024 11:46 AM
Lingerie Fighting Championships Help Fulfill Death-Bed Promise With First Major Motion Picture • BOTY • Jul 31, 2024 9:00 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Significantly Reduces Debt from Multiple Holders • KGKG • Jul 31, 2024 9:00 AM