InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253145
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 701
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 41524

Friday, 02/02/2007 2:51:02 PM

Friday, February 02, 2007 2:51:02 PM

Post# of 253145
>> If the FDA saw a serious—perhaps life-threatening—problem in a combination trial, they could place a clinical hold on all VX-950 development until they sorted it out. Is this a risk VRTX will be willing to take? <<

Given the longstanding unmet need for an effective treatment for nonresponders , I would expect the FDA to be relatively accomodating in this situation. I can imagine a conversation where the FDA agrees that any new , unexpected SAEs in the combo trial will be assumed to be due to the combo and not to VX950 , assuming a good monotherapy database , of course , and subject to change based on postmarketing safety data. Absent this sort of up-front understanding , however , I agree that VRTX would be wise to wait on the combo trials.

BTW , Alam's CC answer to Werber's ITT question sounded like the ramblings of a madman. I bet Alam's eyes were spinning in circles. No wonder he wanted to take it offline.

The VRTX halo is showing some corrosion.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.