InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 400
Posts 48603
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: JonathanCross post# 159146

Friday, 12/10/2021 9:25:56 AM

Friday, December 10, 2021 9:25:56 AM

Post# of 163972
I haven’t read all the threads of late, so maybe this has been discussed in detail. The primary and apparent issue is a simple one. That…it is possible that VYST has been used primarily to enrich the Rotman family. And the mechanism to do that is the consulting contracts to Steve’s kids that allow them to receive large amounts of stock for poorly defined “services” which, after the applicable waiting period, get sold into the market.

In Greg’s case it would appear that he has gone out of his way to avoid being designated as a Section 16b officer, director or 10% affiliate in order to avoid the selling and reporting restrictions of Rule 144.

Were he determined to be an affiliate or control person then the SEC would have ample basis to go after him for violation of Securities Law.

This appears to have been going on for quite some time.

I highly doubt he will file a lawsuit. For the simple reason that he knows that if he were subject to discovery he is quite likely toast.

TK.

"Harsh reality is always better than false hope"

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VYST News