@PaPound... Thanks. I saw it when they announced it.
TBH, it's all BS to me at this point until they clearly articulate exactly when and how their shares will return to public trading, and exactly how legacy shares will be affected. Including audited share counts, not shoddy, weird pseudo balance sheets attached to quarterly shareholder letters. And JV-grade corporate presentations.
Until they do these things and step up their game with shareholders, I really couldn't give a rat's behind about their business initiatives. None of it matters if I can't trade my shares. I'm tired of the uncertainty, and I'm suspicious of their recent lack of responsiveness to legitimate inquiries (believe me, I've tried). The shares have been in limbo for 14+ months now. That is way too long -- if they indeed take the legitimate interests of their legacy shareholders seriously.
The Q4/annual "report" in January will be a very big deal this time. If it's the same, evasive BS with the shareholders, then, unfortunately, this whole thing is going to become adversarial. And that would be a shame, as it is totally unnecessary. I don't expect miracles, but I also don't expect to be ignored or to have my legitimate interests dumped into a black hole indefinitely. If the new officers think they can play it this way, they're going to learn a difficult lesson next year.
AI
