Well, I guess that settles, once and for all, what was truly meant by the disclaimer about imminent share cancellation, in DEST's original chapter 11 filing, right? It was written in plain english. Therefore, those that read and understood the dockets continue to have the apparent edge over some folk that prefer to draw fictitious conclusions from "charts" like a crystal ball.
True, this was always a lotto play for us. I was always appreciative of chemist72 and the dialog that we were able to start here around real prospects, rather than fictitious book values and wishful thinking. I only wish that there'd been a resource for shareholders to have a say in what went down before the share cancellation. Had there been, perhaps all our early misgivings about the auction's "preferred bid" giveaway, duplicate claims and canceled hearings might have gotten some response on the part of the company. Instead, we were left with some false hopes and no outlet for keeping pressure on the company to drive any residual value to the shareholders.
