I am going to provide my analysis on the situation as a whole. I don't care for responses to it. Take it or leave it. It's my opinion and purely that.
First- The PR Thursday that led to the drop seemed timed and constructed in a way that seemed very deliberate to me. The goal is to understand why it was done the way it was...
1st-
Topline safety data showed Brilacidin was generally well-tolerated, with frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events similar between study arms. The number of patients who died totaled eight, four each between active and placebo. In the brilacidin group, one patient who died did not complete the treatment regimen and withdrew from the study. The overall mortality rate (6.67%) in the trial was approximately one-half of what is typically observed in this patient population.
Questions-
Could the drop out of the 4th patient relinquish them from the active group? If so, doesn't that change everything in a study group like this? Aren't the big boys fudging numbers and cherry picking to state outcomes?
Why was primary endpoint only related to deaths to day 29 when the trial says the primary endpoints are such?
Primary outcome measure-
In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Primary Outcome Measures :
Time to sustained recovery through Day 29 [ Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 29 ]
Day of recovery is defined as the first day on which the subject satisfies one of the following three categories from the ordinal scale with response sustained through Day 29:
Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care (other than for per protocol dosing or assessments, as appropriate);
Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen;
Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities.
Why then are we only reporting deaths on this PR and stating it as the only primary outcome? Doesn't above seem to show the weird generalization used in the PR for the primary outcome?
Why was the PR issued 10 minutes into the bell on a holiday rather than Friday after bell?
Why the follow up PR the next day meant particularly for long term investors and then the one the week thereafter stating optimism while stating once again the primary outcome failed? Did it fail? According to the primary outcome measures we have not been given the full information to date...
2nd-
Volume, volume volume... There was a volume explosion but all the long term investors I know didn't sell a single share. Actually, they bought more and averaged down.
+/- 200 million shares traded in just over a week. The only people I know that sold were the ones that had less then 100k shares and I knew a lot of them and stated they'll take the tax loss and move on. They had no real skin in the game and don't really know the science. They came for a quick hit and bailed when it didn't happen in their timeframe. That's called the GET RICH QUICK SYNDROME most people have inherently. Gets ya every time! (dumb money)
WHO PICKED UP ALL THOSE SHARES ON THE CHEAP????
The company knows long term investors with large share counts have no reason to sell. He knows we are here for the long run... There was no way to take profits on the way down, this fell off a damn cliff.
He knows he can stay silent and WE will further defend the science and most likely buy more. THERE HAS BEEN COMPLETE RADIO SILENCE at a time where the share price stagnates under .10 cents. NOT VERY TYPICAL UNLESS THERE ISN'T A WORRY ABOUT SHARE PRICE BY MANAGEMENT.
3rd-
Look at the general views of governments as a whole- Look at the direction being taken since the beginning.
Vaccines, Vaccines, Vaccines.
DoD invites IPIX to symposium.
DoD scientists receive more Brilacidin for further government testing for other infectious diseases.
FDA recommends Compassionate Use while is denies in court other treatments to wanting patients. We saw a patient sue for Ivermectin but was administered Brilacidin after being denied Ivermectin... For better or worse to Brilacidin, THIS HAPPENED... In major news article and seen by us before it became news through social media.
Vaccination mandates have not been fully implemented yet.
New variant is causing new states of emergencies around the world and in the U.S.. NY just issued a prelim state of emergency with the tag- Get Vaccinated Now!
Vaccinations, Vaccination, Vaccinations- Boosters, Boosters, Boosters... And they'll be ready for Omnicron is record time!!! Hahaha.
I am not an anti-vaxxer, I just have 6 senses to see, feel, hear, smell and taste what the deal is while validating it with my gut....
What happens if a cure for moderate to severe COVID-19 is promoted in mainstream media????????
Will the mandated hold-outs have another argument to disagree with government and their employers to be vaccinated?
Religious exemption- NOPE
Philosophical exemption- NOPE
Private Business Exemption- NOPE
How do you reason with someone that says I don't need the vaccine because there is a cure if I'm hospitalized with severe COVID????
Overall Opinion to wrap this up-
This was deliberate- Leo is close to the helm with the government, what they need for their agenda and has been given a carrot for other infectious diseases if he plays by the rules with all things COVID. COVID-19 is a NATIONAL DEFENSE ISSUE.... Period...... Look at the other companies that bypassed the government hand. They have been shot down, called dewormers by mainstream media, they have been rejected for use to dying patients although our new novel substance has been administered.
Don't we all know here with our 6th sense that you need to play ball???
Leo is playing ball....
Besides this.... Let's say Leo has Gilead (for example) with a business opportunity. Gilead is playing ball with the government with Remdesivir. They know what's up.
Who has continuously had major holdings through it's main firm and subsidiaries in Gilead since 2006.... Citadel.
Who is to say that Leo is playing by the rules of both Governments and Big Pharma?
As a CEO do you care about the FOMO group that came in a few weeks ago or the flippers? Do you know your long term investors with large shares will and need to stick?
Wouldn't Gilead and any other large pharma need to protect their main investors?
Haven't we heard about naked shares for years from the big guys like Citadel?
Wouldn't it behoove Gilead to make a deal with Leo that coincides with the Primary outcome PR?
Does anyone think those 200 million shares may now be in the hands of these brokers whether to clear the naked short or just load up before what happens next?
Let's assume Gilead says they will give $5 per share later on. Wouldn't it offset costs if they can obtain those shares earlier through brokers that are already largely invested in their company? Offset future costs.......
Leo played ball with the FDA to adjust the primary outcome to remove eyes from IPIX and diminish any sort of cure while we continue with the process of vaccinated all individuals- GOAL NUMERO UNO!!
Leo issued the PR when he did to keep large long term investors off the trigger for the significant drop in share price which gave no opportunity to take profits. It did allow for investors with little skin to jump and take the loss and move on while "others" got those shares on the cheap. 200 MILLION SHARES TRADED in a weeks time.
Leo issued further PR stating the optimism and further science with the carrots that have been placed in from of his face from the government. I think later on we will hear about the carrots big pharma has placed too.
There has been no time period given for "secondary endpoints" to be announced, they are under further investigation.....
I have a feeling it will coincide with what the FDA says to do as they progress towards vaccine mandate adherence and until they are fully satisfied. Brilacidin will be great for so many other infectious diseases but COVID won't be one of them, just yet.... Let's say everyone is vaccinated to satisfaction by Jan 4th 2022, well then, I think Brilacidin will be utilized in conjunction with other drugs like Remdesivir as a cocktail for moderate to severe Covid. Maybe Gilead made a play for Brilacidin and Aviptadil. Look what happened to Relief Tharepeutics, denied breakthrough just after registering on the US OTC... Hmmmmm. It too is at .06 cents. Coincidence? Who knows......
I don't care about anyone's responses. This is my opinion and my opinion ONLY... I don't think this ship has sailed in ANYWAY. I think it's at port until until King Ferdinand the II blesses and finances the voyage. BUT NOT UNTIL THEN....
Worried about getting vaccinated? If you do it quickly maybe King Ferdinand the II will left his hand and issue the Bon Voyage. I'm still in on this investment and i will continue to purchase more while I take a few shares of Relief therapy as well. My gut feels what's to come.
Good Luck to All. Enjoy the Holiday Season!
FatAl OUT!
AI
