InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 512
Posts 59514
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: Seriously123 post# 66295

Friday, 11/19/2021 8:03:47 AM

Friday, November 19, 2021 8:03:47 AM

Post# of 75432
First of all, you claimed Timmy Toy.....found

the "Ring Site," which is a most amusing name. Ohhh, it sounds so promising by inserting the word SITE. Fittings for rigging would be "rings" and they would be numerous. A mast could have broken off during a storm and these fittings could have come from that, not the wreck itself. That's all that's there, a few artifacts. Nothing suggest it's a wreck site.

Also, I have the latest reports. They are not over a year old. Area 1's activities are thru Sept 1, and Area 2 is thru July 13. The reports are submitted, then redactions are made before the public can view them.

The reports BY THE STATUTE are to contain ALL fieldwork done. The Timmy Toy activities are reported and NOTHING has been found by it per the reports SFRX submitted. Whoever told you that misinformed you.

If that is false and things are so promising then why doesn't Kyle post the reports so the public can view them?

Here's a screen shot of the most current report. Mind you, this activity is from last December, when the discovery was made. Where does it say the Timmy Toy discovered this site?

Notice the reference to Aug 2014. What were they doing in August 2014? Looking at info obtained from HTQ, and that's when they PR'd they (ahem) found the cannon. Everyone knows now the cannon was previously found by HTQ. HTQ determined this area was JUNK and worthless to real salvors and moved on. SFRX is going back over previously searched and known areas per the latest reports.

What is the last word below......scatter. It's not a wreck site....ie hull or ballast pile.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News