InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 12863
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/16/2001

Re: None

Tuesday, 11/16/2021 7:46:23 PM

Tuesday, November 16, 2021 7:46:23 PM

Post# of 28680
"There is little or no benefit useable [for the V Financial Group] from the earlier [Bourque Industries] custodianship [attempt]." - MerthyrQ

Actually the V Financial Group obtained a big useable benefit (lesson), that being don't rely on a past (10+ years) trend to predict current status of a company when there remains active forces within the company to become successful. For Bourque Industries the fact that they have not declared bankruptcy after 10+ years and recently spent time and money on research & development for a patent (that finalized the Kryron process) when they had no cash and no sales. If the V Financial Group took the time to investigate Bourque Industries, even this IH board, they would have concluded that Bourque Industries could be successful if John Bourque agreeded to lose his majority share holdings by agreeing to conditions demanded by a new investment (i need 100m) opportunity that remained opened for acceptment.

It's understood that John Bourque would relinquest his control rather that the conditions of a custodianship that very likely had no desire to bring Kryron to the market knowing it would take money and time on a expertise in alloy technology they did not have in-house, resulting in the V Financial Group to sell all patents for peanuts, and they sell the empty shell resulting in lunch-money for the V Financial Group.

My opinion is that the V Financial Group mistakenly understood that bringing the Kryron product to market was a dead issue, not ever to happen, even by them.

The V Financial Group entered this custodianship attempt thinking Bourque Industries was a shell of a dead company having patents not being, or to be, used.

I see no chance that Bourque Industries will work with the V Financial Group and their so-stated "utilizing their own capital" knowing John Bourque and the Board of Director Puppets would be trash to be taking out eventually using the power of the court, and then decide Kryron was a product not to be invested in.

I predict my post https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166767318 is valid for a Horizontal Acquisition happening.

RockQQ's post https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166797152 corrects many inaccurities (my opinion) of the assertions you made in https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166796248 and your follow-up post https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=166797605

doug

The posts contained on my (gotmilk) account are my own opinions and are not recommendations or advise to buy or sell any security, stocks or other investments. These posts are for entertainment purposes only, not to be chewed over as facts or truth.