InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 2912
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2012

Re: sunspotter post# 382098

Friday, 11/05/2021 9:10:26 PM

Friday, November 05, 2021 9:10:26 PM

Post# of 403099
I recall reading about a study a few years ago where the BP used a substance in the placebo that would produce the same adverse events that they were expecting their drug to produce. That way their new drug did not look as bad because the placebo caused just as many SAEs as the drug. I do not think the FDA properly exercises oversight when it comes to BPs; so I do not trust Merck, particularly under these circumstances. The EUA will protect them from significant liability and then proving that molnupiravir caused your cancer is a very steep uphill climb anyway. It’s a perfect opportunity for an unethical company to make big money at our expense. Because of the limit on liability, the actuaries can easily predict that the costs incurred for even a significant number of deaths is worth the risk. No, I do not trust Merck.

Merck said,

…no deaths were reported in patients who received molnupiravir, as compared to 8 deaths in patients who received placebo


"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

Upton Sinclair

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News