InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 42
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2019

Re: changes_iv post# 43071

Wednesday, 11/03/2021 2:49:00 PM

Wednesday, November 03, 2021 2:49:00 PM

Post# of 44690
Interesting news article/paper pairing about the spike protein inhibiting dna repair. I would make the claim that the article itself is fairly negligent. I do not see any effort to explain that all of these claims about the effects of the spike protein on the immune system/DNA repair etc would be equally and even more so true for anyone who has had or will have a "natural" covid infection. It's the same mRNA sequence/spike protein(plus a slew of other mRNA/proteins/antigens etc) with a natural infection. I'm really not sure people understand this.

You could replace every reference in this article of the effects of the vaccine and replace it with the effects of a natural infection and you would be accurate, and your take away would be totally different.

It's an interesting pairing because in the actual source paper it is much more clear.

Some fun with a line from the news article:
Original: "5G exposure, chemtrail exposure, food chemical exposure, mammography and even sunlight exposure will wreak havoc in those who have taken mRNA vaccines"

Edited: "5G exposure, chemtrail exposure, food chemical exposure, mammography and even sunlight exposure will wreak havoc in those who have had natural covid-19 infections"

Isn't that interesting how different it comes off?

By the way, I have no idea how accurate the source article is. It is based on in vitro studies which may or may not play out meaningfully in vivo. I'm skeptical that in vivo DNA repair is inhibited by 90% in any meaningful amount of the population as we would already being seeing a dramatic effect of that in the population of both vaccinated and naturally infected people. It's obviously worth researched further, though. This isn't really the point of my response, however.

It's also very important to point out that treatments, like Aviptadil, wouldn't stop this claimed Spike protein effect from taking place either. It would mean the best course of action would be to develop another vaccine using a different antigen. Seriously, if the claims of this paper were/are true then a new vaccine is really the ONLY answer. The virus in all it's forms is almost ubiquitous now. It's here, and basically everyone will end up being exposed to it over time and will therefore be exposed to the effects of the spike protein.