InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 2912
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2012

Re: sunspotter post# 381123

Wednesday, 11/03/2021 10:45:45 AM

Wednesday, November 03, 2021 10:45:45 AM

Post# of 402936
Sunspotter said,

No, it doesn't. There are literally dozens of compounds that work excellently against COVID 19 in vitro, but don't work at all in vivo.



You did not address my point. Did any of those “dozens of compounds” work in vivo against ABSSSI? I didn’t think so. Brilacidin has already worked in vivo. My point stands.

Sunspotter said,

And there is remdesivir, with an SI of over 1000 (brilacidin is a mere 426) that has marginal efficacy at best.



And once again, that questionable 1000 SI number for Remdesivir was determined by Gilead employees. Cell Research says that Remdesivir’s real SI number is 129.87. Perhaps that’s why Remdesivir’s performance in the clinic is not as good as Gilead led the FDA to believe it would be when they filed for the EUA. The 426 SI number for Brilacidin was determined by independent testing at a US Regional Biocontainment Laboratory. So, which SI numbers are more likely to be accurate?

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

Upton Sinclair

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News