InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 74
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2021

Re: RSI38 post# 59528

Tuesday, 11/02/2021 11:47:58 AM

Tuesday, November 02, 2021 11:47:58 AM

Post# of 64411
Have you considered the possible ramifications of a public statement about it?

It's a slippery slope. If he were to make a public statement about why it is there(and you already have that answer many times over from people on this board who have communicated with him), the next thing people like yourself would immediately demand is a comment about it. If he just came out and reconfirmed "the why" without saying anything further it would be assumed that he agrees (or at least doesn't disagree) with OTC's decision. If he then followed up with a comment of why he disagrees with it, he would risk further alienating a group that controls our ability to trade in a proper manner in the short term. That certainly wouldn't be helpful.

Why put himself in that predicament? It's a lose-lose proposition. Your want for an answer that you already have is really the equivalent of cutting your nose off to spite your face. The short term gratification is not worth the potential ramifications. The court of public opinion is not always the best route to go. Most of the longs seem to get that.

In my opinion, I would prefer that the focus continue to be on building the business and on getting the CE removed rather than starting down a slippery slope to appease a few shareholders. An update on how things are going behind the scenes would be something I would be happier to hear about.