NetList Inc (NLST)

[umiak]

I remember this but not how it was posted, YMB:

Google still talks about absolute intervening right on Claim 16. The only thing that is disputed in Claim 16 by Google is that the delay lock loop in DDR4 Server memory modules is a lot different than a phase lock loop. I saw this on Reddit posted by GSOP912 or HAJ 2months ago there that Samsung agreed with Netlist that the phase lock loop is substantially the same & that the difference is negligible, so this falls under the doctrine of equivalents. This wipes out their complete Claim 16 defense. This evidence was sealed. Our legal team must do something to use this as evidence V Google.