Wednesday, October 27, 2021 11:49:24 AM
Why?
The SEC, upon reviewing said (at this point, non-existent) S-1, would reject it, based on its claims of future revenue from the mining venture. As well, mentioning a 43-101 also raises an immediate red flag, and brands the company as quite clueless. Of course, seeing as there has yet to be any serious exploration, let alone geo reports, feasibility studies, etc etc, they are years from possibly reaching proven reserves status.
Second, NASDAQ would do the same. However, why even mention a NASDAQ application, when the stock is far from meeting the listing requirements?
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM