Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[clarencebeaks21]

Robert, IMO that phrasing is more of a procedural ‘catch-all’. If new material evidence arises at trial, P can then still request that their remedy be reconsidered or reconciled to this new evidence.

But, speaking from experience, sadly the catch-all is most notable when Ps *forget* to use it; because in that particular case, Ds can take advantage of Ps omission & object to Ps in-discovery or trial motion to reconsider remedy. And the judge IMO will agree with D.