"In that case, please explain just what it is you expect the courts to do."
Well, Kelly v. USA., for starters. I also look forward to other lawsuits brought forward. Before you say it, yes I know we have to see it taken up by a judge and not dismissed, but what plaintiff in Kelly v USA seeks, differs from collins and others. Of which I am aware, as you stated, what they are seeking in those cases.
A. Finding a takings or illegal exacted from plaintiff
B. Determine and award damages suffered
C. Determine and award damages from breach of implied regulatory rights
D. Fees/ expenses
E. (Most interesting to me)
Granting ALL other RELIEF as THIS COURTS deems just and appropriate.
My post and thoughts, in which you replied, was not a prediction of the future and not a recommendation. Just my thoughts and goal for my investment. Either way I will, imo, do well. I just can't and wont give a prediction of how well and when it happens. Some scenarios have longer odds than others and I accept all outcomes. This is the choice I made after weighing risk and reward. I totally understand why some have jps, common, or both. I have held commons for a while and sticking around til the end. Not going to switch over to jps. Some on other side might agree and are doing the same, just in the other direction.
There is possibility in what I say, just it is rejected because of people fearing the probability of what I say.
Also govt coercing a "conservatorship" based on lies and not financial condition, taken profit on a forced "loan", saying the forced "loan" wasn't paid back, and then wanting to cash warrants in for more money IS GREED.
Those, including myself, calling for cancellation of warrants to prevent further illegal taking by a GREEDY GOV'T is NOT.
Stopping further theft, is what I call for.
Return of value to the shares of two companies I own part of, is what I call for.
Well there it is. You asked a question and I hopefully answered it. Thanks for your time reading and responding.
