InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 7126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: vajus post# 102173

Tuesday, 10/19/2021 10:43:48 AM

Tuesday, October 19, 2021 10:43:48 AM

Post# of 104562
This is incorrect. The trial has been delayed as both parties have agreed to first have the the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board review five of the company's patents. Once this is completed by May of 2022, the parties will no longer be fighting about validity but whether Samsung infringed. Regardless, getting a top infringement law firm and a 3rd party to finance up to ~$10M in court costs (after spending a year on due diligence) is a pretty good indication of the strength of Nanoco's case.

This is apples and oranges relative to QMC's nuisance case with K&L Gates. If most of the key claims in Nanoco's patents hold up, they have suffered actual financial damage that will be in the hundreds of millions, maybe even a billion over the period of infringement. QMC has suffered little to no loss from their relationship with K&L.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.