DO SHAREHOLDERS STAND TO LOSE SUBSTANTIALLY IF NRXP CLAIMS TO ZYESAMI ARE ALLOWED TO STAND UNCHALLENGED??? DO BIG PHARMA, MMs AND GOVERNMENT FEUDAL LORDS STAND TO GAIN???
Someone made a really good point. We are close to an EUA. Despite the value drop the true value is near 1.00. Sad to see anyone abandon (for lack of a better word) this and succumb and sell low. Completely contrary to sound principles. I guess too many flippers. Totally agree now is the time to buy. I guess people forget or aren?t aware this jumped 38,000% last year upon announcements relating to FDA approval of IND and Houston Methodist study. A huge mistake to jump off the train which unfortunately has gone wrong direction with negativity, impatience, short tactics etc. Javitt is angry and trying to protect his #$%$ by misleading RLF investors into thinking RLF abandoned a contract and he knows at the same time his lawyers publicly offered to go to mediation. This means his lawyers believe they stand to lose something if they proceed to trial while also believing Relief also stands to lose something potentially if it goes to trial. Javitt?s comments have contributed to the fear and decline in SP. Relief is aware of this tactic and impact on its holders and must decide which path to take. It be nice to hear from management on the status of things as the lack of communication is also contributing to the decline in SP. We continue to lose the longer this drags on.
~ Mathieu, Y@h00 RLFTF finance conversations
