InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 2529
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2015

Re: 3X Charm post# 186050

Wednesday, 10/13/2021 6:11:31 PM

Wednesday, October 13, 2021 6:11:31 PM

Post# of 232977
I'd have to disagree with that. And apparently the judge disagreed, too.

"Where Plaintiffs [13ders] ultimately went wrong here is by playing fast and loose in their responses to key inquiries embedded in the advance notice bylaw, and then submitting their Nomination Notice on the eve of the deadline, leaving no time to fix the deficient disclosures when the incumbent Board exposed the problem"

"Applying the unambiguous terms of the advance notice bylaw, it is clear Plaintiffs’ Nomination Notice fell short of what was required. In particular, Plaintiffs were obliged to disclose who was “supporting” their efforts and information regarding potential conflicts. Rather than offer specific information, or even general information, regarding their supporters, Plaintiffs chose to disclose nothing. They also failed to provide information regarding an obvious conflict involving a nominator and a nominee. These omissions, in turn, left their Nomination Notice fatally incomplete."

Talk about not being able to fill out forms… the incompetence at Cydy a is mortifying.


This is GREAT NEWS - huh??? The 13D gang of miscreants is dead - DOA!!!

Glad the to see the judicial system still works!

My comments are just my opinions and should NOT be taken as investment advice.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News