InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 4722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2012

Re: Seriously123 post# 65566

Wednesday, 10/13/2021 8:49:20 AM

Wednesday, October 13, 2021 8:49:20 AM

Post# of 76828
Quote: It's been almost a year since we found a real wreck. If you remember last year in November we found a wreck in Melbourne we call the ring site
________________________________________________

Quite a presumption. Would you please explain on what basis you make the statement 'since we found a real wreck'. There is no evidence that SFRX has ever even found a 'real wreck'. You know, the kind of 'real wreck' that has in evidence ballast stones, (when Spanish) hundreds if not thousands of broken olive jar shards (intact jars), cannons, anchors, thousands of artifacts, tons of treasure in the form of silver and gold coins and bars, etc., etc. Is that the kind of 'real wreck' you are referring to?

It's rather confusing isn't it when a company like this has flaunted but to date never factually proven the 'see all, know all 'Timmy Toy' that's suppose to analytically define these mentioned things (ferrous/non-ferrous), the sub-bottom depth, size, weight and all that kind of good stuff, but nevertheless this in word only nonsense continues on and on with no evidence. Yes, rather confusing.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News