Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[rapz]

Got it! Thank you.

Donato has a standard schedule for IP cases. Unlike Koh, he is more knowledgeable in the IP-related technology and infringement issues. The court clerk could not have scheduled it without any input from the judge. Did judge Donato ignore Hudnell's motion for dismissal and ignore judge Albright's/Koh's rulings on the patent similarity issue? Or there are other issues? Waiting for the NDCal courts bless us next week with disclosures.

In the recent past, when Donato was assigned a case against FB, he endorsed the Illinois court ruling against FB a fine of $1000/subscriber for violating individual privacy, amounting to several billions. Later he changed his mind; heard very little news about the FB case.

After the Wall St Journal report of stock ownership influencing judge's rulings, no one knows how to interpret these rulings anymore.

Any response from the other two judges?