Saturday, October 09, 2021 9:31:30 AM
Re: MackG
post# 377911
Which is that...the proof of their existence or the explanation of why they would buy a share to replace one that they didn't borrow?
"I'm sure the holders of naked short shares appreciate your continuing assertion of their non-existence."
Sure. I'm doing it for them. Ya got me.
Meanwhile you could address the two simple issues I'm raising and actually make a point.
Still waiting.