InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 209
Posts 32146
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: falcon74 post# 377895

Friday, 10/08/2021 9:42:23 PM

Friday, October 08, 2021 9:42:23 PM

Post# of 402972
"until you can provide facts that disprove JFM's comments."
If your mentor had asserted facts they could be disproven...one can't disprove comments. But lets see....

"Good Clinicial Trial results will certainly smoke out the issue."
Svengali was right about that. At least as far as the short interest is concerned...good trial results should prompt a lot of covering and provide a short term pop to the share price.
But there's no reason to think that good results will reveal a naked short issue, even if there is one. I'm sure you know how a naked short share is created. If you do you also know that it doesn't have to be covered. The name and cusip changes were supposed to "smoke out the issue". Were you here when they didn't?

Bad or mediocre results won't smoke out anything though and we can be sure this fantasy that poses as an excuse will go on and on and on should that occur.

https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm
There were 5,888 IPIX shares undelivered on 9/3.
They were gone the next day and there were no new fails thru the end of the reporting period (9/14).
How long do I have to wait before you or justcauseIsayso or ANYONE proves the existence of a naked short "position" in IPIX?


As my dear old grandfather Litvak said (just before they swung the trap), he said "You can't cheat an honest man. Never give a sucker an even break or smarten up a chump."

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News