InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2195
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/30/2012

Re: The Lawman post# 187680

Monday, 10/04/2021 3:08:06 PM

Monday, October 04, 2021 3:08:06 PM

Post# of 233052
I'm just a regular shareholder who has never communicated with anyone at Cytodyn for any reason. Not compensated in any way.

My suspicions on the 13 D have been dead correct. My opinions before the 13D was ever public were dead right. I never liked Patterson , didn't agree with the former Board and the whole Pestell and Tony C gang or their supporters.

I'm not a Nader cult follower, his overly enthusiastic timelines are never met. However his logic about pursuing the lower hanging fruit makes sense. He has the company prioritizing what can bring revenue soonest.

They haven't said , but if I was them , due to the almost purposeful failures of Amarex in trials and the HIV BLA. I would suspect some landmines ( buried errors ) in the BLA and would have some highly qualified people going over it with a fine tooth comb.

Beyond that, taking the extra time to vet the BLA and allowing other developments and maybe some revenue allows them to approach the FDA as a stronger, more stable applicant as well as having a more accurate and complete application.

So for me, it's not that is has to be Nader, but more that it should not be anyone from or related, connected to the 13D.

Jmo.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News