Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

This is excerpted from a govt "legal answers" site. It states:


Who decides guilt in civil cases?
jury
In civil cases the jury decides whether the defendant is liable on the balance of probabilities.


So I think Ive now made a pretty solid case for saying you can be found guilty or not in a civil case. I've also shown its really no more than semantics if the jury & the court does not specifically use the word guilty in their verdict. It is abundantly clear that vplm was charged with or accused of, breach of fiduciary duty & unjust enrichment and the jury found against vplm in that regard. So, I SAY IT IS A MOOT POINT WHETHER THE VERDICT USES THE TERM GUIKTY OR NOT. VPLM WAS FOUND TO BE AT FAULT. AND THE ARGUMENT THAT THE "GUILTY PARTIES" WERE SOME OLD ROGUE MEMBERS, IS SHIT DOWN AS CLEAR AS A BELL, AS THE "DEFENDANTS" WERE CLEARLY NAMED TO BE MALAK & SAWYER, ET AL.