InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1224
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2014

Re: None

Monday, 09/13/2021 9:04:14 PM

Monday, September 13, 2021 9:04:14 PM

Post# of 140476
Lawyers do what they're told...

This is a two-way agreement. The form of these agreements set the tone of the relationship. While MDT didn't want all that was disclosed like in the Mazor partnership - TMDI did want public disclosure b/c Mc needed to have some form of announcement of progress to save his 6.

So that's why we have the redactions and the agreements published.

What's interesting was the disclosures in the new investor presentation. MDT DID have to approve some of that detail, and Mc HAD to disclose it b/c of his fiduciary duties. That investor presentation was another form of communication with the general public to begin to set the foundation for future expectations. We're still a publicly traded entity - until we're not. IMO, the BOD required most of that investor content to limit the lawsuit risk should this come to a BO. Each step of this relationship has to be disclosed, in some form publicly or there's a risk of breach of fiduciary duties. It's more powerful than many may realize.

MDT isn't saying anything b/c again, they don't want Mazor 2.0. While Mc does want some form of Mazor 2.0. Share price appreciation will occur, but the question is when, and what will be the catalyst? That's the exciting part of this investment.

Good luck to all. Regards,BK.