NSAV Holding Inc (NSAV)

[mfaphoto]

fnyack, I'm just answering your rhetorical question because you wanted a reply. My reply is a resounding YES, it could survive another fumble. But, before I get to my reasons, the first postponement was not a fumble, but a careful decision made at the last moment because of the rapidly changing legal landscape. If they did not postpone, the exchange might have been closed and NSAV and SBC sued for huge money. They made the right move, regardless of the disappointment. Now, should NSAV and SBC do something like that again, the same reaction would take place. The stock would crash. However, the realities of the business, the people running it, and the fact of the exchanges being reality at some point, would outweigh everything that had happened. Money rules. If good revenues are coming in, the stock will rise. I believe it would rise a lot, regardless of how low it goes. So, if it did tank before the opening of the exchanges, I will scrape together every penny I have to buy as much as I can, because regardless of where it goes in the short term, in the long term it will go to dollars. IMO. The five geniuses and billionaires running NSAV and SBC are not in this to fail or for pennies. They are building a sizeable company that trades for dollars. IMO. "See you on the moon", said our Director Mr. Yuen Wong. He should know