Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

"The fact that the growers retain a contingent interest of indetermi-
nate value does not mean there has been no taking, particularly
when that interest depends on the discretion of the taker, and may be
worthless, as it was for one of the two years at issue here. Andrus v.
Allard, 444 U. S. 51, distinguished. Once there is a taking, as in the
case of a physical appropriation, any payment from the Government
in connection with that action goes, at most, to the question of just
compensation."

"The clear and administrable rule
is that “just compensation normally is to be measured by ‘the market
value of the property at the time of the taking.’ ” United States v. 50
Acres of Land, 469 U. S. 24, 29"

Question: Having been briefed by the Fannie Mae CFO, that the golden years were just ahead, Was the value of the taking via the nws NOT related to stock price on the OTCBB SINCE THE TAKER WAS PRIVY TO INSIDER INFORMATION?